Monthly Archives: March 2014

Common Relationship Mistakes

Making quick judgements: small events can skew your perception and impression of someone else in the wrong way if you don’t verify and validate. For example, if a guy ruffles the head of another guy, I once assumed that must mean they are really good friends, since why would you let a stranger do that?  Turns out they were barely acquaintances.  A more common example is when a guy and a girl arrives together, and people assume they are a couple when they aren’t.  Read Who Am I? and Nature of Your Own Identity.  

Projecting the past: when you meet someone new who reminds you of someone you know, and you project, unfairly, the previous experience onto the new one.  While it is OK to use history as a predicting mechanism, don’t mistake prediction for truth.  Everyone deserves a chance to be judged independently for who they are.

Mistake Standards for Preferences: It’s OK to have preferences: to like sports and not like pickles; to like extroverts or prefer online forums.  Some people, you get along with better than others.  That is your preference: don’t mistake this for superiority, which is what you are saying when you accuse one person of being “better” than another.  You are friends with Bob and not Bo because you prefer Bob’s characteristics over Bo’s, not because Bob is superior to Bo.  On the flip side, if someone does not like you, it does not mean you are not good enough: it is a preference, not a standard.

Nice relativity: not being nice does not make someone mean, doing mean things does.  Also, unless you understand where the person is coming from, don’t make quick judgments–everyone has a different definition of what is nice, and what is mean, and they also have a different expectation for different people.  What someone might think is nice, someone else might think is normal, polite manners.  What someone else thinks is mean, might just be normal behavior to someone else.  Saying no is not mean, people have a right to say no.

Money and Desire: I used to think wanting money/etc. made someone a bad person. I have since learned that this is false: it’s OK to want things, and it is not the desire itself that makes a person bad.  It is in how that desire manifests into decisions and actions that determines whether a person is good or bad.

Pedestal – When you are overly judgmental in an extremely optimistic manner.  No-one is perfect (Overcome Perfectionism), if you see no cons it just means you haven’t found them yet.  Life has both good and bad, so it’s about finding the right combination for the relationship.

Identity Insecurity – If you don’t know who you are, then you are likely to give yourself up to the other person.  This is fine if that’s what you want, but if you want to be your own person, you need to know where you stand in order to make a stand when you need to. (How to Find, Understand, Construct, Who You Are)

Self-Confidence Insecurity – Lack of confidence in yourself, commonly because you have low self worth.  Read What is Self Worth to get it and Confidence to understand it.

Behaviors

Sacrifice: is an over-glorified way of demonstrating care, and it needs to be understood since it is frequently mis-used.  Sacrifice alone is not a sign of care: if you are doing something that isn’t ideal because you care about someone, you should ask yourself if there was a better way to plan ahead so that you didn’t have to make that sacrifice, while still achieving your goals.  Thinking that way makes you smart, not uncaring.  Only sacrifice when you need to, and not unnecessarily.  However, with that being said, unnecessary sacrifice can deepen a bond if used correctly: say you spend extra time on a gift for someone.  You sacrificed some free time, but you didn’t have to sacrifice any serious commitments–breaking a promise to someone else so that you can scramble to find a last minute gift would be bad planning and unnecessary sacrifice.

Lots more to read in my post on Insecurity and Overcome Illogical Thoughts of Insecure People

To find out when more Life Education Curriculum is released, subscribe on the side! Follow on Twitter, on Facebook, on Google+, on Tumblr.  Please share your comments to this post below.

The Nature of Relationships with People

Here are some important things to know about relationships.

Relationships have states, and that state can be based on time and context.  Time refers to how when you first meet, you are strangers, then you might become acquaintances, friends, close friends, like family, family.  Context refers to how at school you are a student, but at home you are a son or daughter, and in a club you might be president while at work you are an employee, etc.

Relationships have health, and the health behaves like a plant: it grows stronger if you water it, and weaker if you stop.  If you stop interacting with someone completely, the relationship has been suspended.  Sure you can resume the relationship, and if you are close enough friends, it will feel as though the relationship never ended, but the truth is that it did end for the duration that you were apart.  Don’t mistake a healthy relationship state (like close friend) for a healthy relationship health (traveling through life together).

Relationships take time and are not guaranteed: just because you want to have [deep] [meaningful] relationships, doesn’t mean you will get them quickly, or even at all.  You must wait and hope because it is out of your control.  It is out of your control because a true relationship is genuine: there’s only so much work you can do before you’re no longer true to yourself.

People Lie: Verify everything before accepting it as truth.  (Doing it too much is paranoia–focus on validating important information rather than everything.)  Fact checking “world facts” is easy with Google, but fact checking “people facts” is harder: be wary of gossip.  However, people have a right to privacy, and sometimes you don’t deserve the truth: it is not your right to know, so if someone lies to you, they may have good reason to–don’t force it out of them.  Example: Parents don’t want child to know the child was adopted.

See the Theory of What are Relationships? (add a like to this post to what are relationships?)

To find out when more Life Education Curriculum is released, subscribe on the side! Follow on Twitter, on Facebook, on Google+, on Tumblr.  Please share your comments to this post below.

Nature of Your Own Identity

Identity is complicated.  It is influenced by many factors, here are a few:

  • Your past, present, and future.  The important take away from this is to recognize that who you are today is who you are in the present: don’t let an identity from your past linger in your present reality, and don’t mistake your future potential for your present reality.
  • Reality and imagination.  There’s who you really are, and who you think you are or want to be.  Be honest with yourself about this so that details are clear instead of confusing.
  • Actions and Intentions.  There’s the interpretation of your actions (you pushed Bob), and the intention behind said action (to save him from being hit by a rock).   Are you what you do, or what you intend to do?  This leads us to
  • Judgment, perception, and impression.  Everyone judges differently, and the kind of judgment varies by context.  In a math class, you’re judged on math ability; in basketball, you’re judged in basketball ability.  Pushing Bob from a legal perception may be judged as Physical Abuse, but the impression given to Bob’s parent’s may be that it was a heroic action.  However, if change the story to say that Bob is pushed into a wall, then questions are raised about whether you were trying to save Bob from being hit by the rock or whether you were trying to harm him with the wall.  This example is given to illustrate how complicated actions can get, how difficult judging the truth can be, and how different the conclusions drawn can be depending on perception and impression.  
    • Three tools used to navigate judgment and identity are Statistics, Timescale, and Context.  Statistics is used to measure how likely an event is: If you are kind to Bob 99/100 times, then you were probably trying to help him.  If you are unkind to Bob 99/100 times, then you were probably trying to harm him.  Timescale comes in to describe the data set used for your statistics.  If I see you being unkind to Bob 99/100 times while you’re 7 years old, not see you for 60 years, and then see you being kind to Bob 2/2 times when you’re 67 years old, I can presume that even though the statistics show you’re more often unkind than kind to Bob, you have probably changed identities from mean to nice to Bob.  Or I can say that because the 99 instances of you being unkind to Bob was spread out over 60 years, your kindness at age 67 was probably the exception to the rule.  Context is used to bring understanding into the picture: I can understand that a 7 year old has maturity than a 67 year old, so I can understand the difference in behavior and perceived identity, and realize that the unkindness was just a phase.
  • Age.  As shown in the Bob example above, a person can change from harmful to kind.  In fact, nearly all aspects of a person change with age: physical, emotional, mental, spiritual, material possessions, abilities, etc..  As such, no-one’s identity is constant: if you think you know someone today, unless you keep up with them, you probably know them less well a few years later.  However, for some people, there are core aspects of them that don’t change–that’s the first indicator of who that person is: what identity do they preserve and keep constant, whether voluntarily or involuntarily.
  • External details and Internal details.  External details may change–body will change with age.  Not all external details change–if someone is a passionate collector of Pokemon cards, certain aspects of the collection will never change.  Internal details may change–someone can go from having a great memory for Sports Teams, to having difficulty remembering what game is on TV.  Not all internal details change–someone will always enjoy watching sports, even as the memory fades.
  • Experiences. You can learn about who you are by placing yourself in new surroundings and seeing how you respond–since it is a new surrounding, there is no default response to hide behind, so you are bound to reveal who you are deep down. Furthermore, as you experience different ranges of things, you’ll find the range you are comfortable with, and where you draw those lines are where you find who you are.  How you compromise also reflects who you are.
    • Whatever we experience, social skills and cultural awareness guide us to “act” in ways that are “appropriate” for the situation.  On one hand, “When in Rome, do as Romans do” will allow you to gain the full experience if you’re trying to embrace local culture, but on the other hand, there is a lack of authenticity in such an act if it is not a reflection of who you truly are.  Genuineness comes when we tone down the characters and polite manners we have, and speak heart to heart about the core values and beliefs that make up who we are.

Who am I?

To find out when more Life Education Curriculum is released, subscribe on the side! Follow on Twitter, on Facebook, on Google+, on Tumblr.  Please share your comments to this post below.